CP
Skip navigation.

Policy Critique

Capital Rules!

By: Chris Walker

The economy has radically changed since the era when Adam Smith championed the "upstart" businessmen who dared to challenge the merchant monopolies that dominated the economy of his day. For Smith, the government created monopoly distorted the market, and granted unfair privilege and power to one sector of the population. In his view, this privilege could not be justified. It is highly unlikely Smith could have foreseen the day when private power would become so great that it would be possible for mega-corporations to sue governments for damages, and win!

Liberals engage in political double-speak to sell private health care to New Brunswickers.

Once again we see that the current NB Liberal Government does not understand the word 'democracy', nor does it understand that it is expected to govern in the interests of the people, not private business.

By the Editors of The Citizens' Press

Mike Murphy, the once President of the New Brunswick Liberal Association (A.K.A. the Liberal Party of New Brunswick), now private insurance lawyer, has seemed to have found the perfect place in government to increase business for lawyers: become Minister of Health and promote the privatisation of NB Health Care.

NB Liberal Party Needs a Sober Second Thought

By the Editors of The Citizens' Press

The New Brunswick Liberal Party needs a sober second thought before putting the fate of the NB economy in the hands of the current cabal of neo-liberal ideologues and quack economists of the NB Self Sufficiency Task Force. The Task Force has gone off the road with its new proposal to get quick cash for policies that New Brunswickers reject.

New Brunswickers need a real job creation strategy, not some loony ideas from a task-force that seems only to be able to dream up new ways of taxing the working people of the province. The latest edition from the Self-Sufficiency Task Force on selling NB Liquor Bonds is yet another half thought-out plan to get money to pay for lavish, costly, and unnecessary infrastructure projects. A real made in New Brunswick solution should not equate with selling our economy down the river in a way that will lock in New Brunswick tax-payers into what amounts to a long-term debt-repayment scheme.

Process used by Self-Sufficiency Task Force Undemocratic -- Press Release

Citizens of New Brunswick deserve an open debate about their future.

N.B., Also available in audio format: Listen here.

“A task force charged to solve a particularly complex problem is generally comprised of individuals representing a variety of perspectives, expertise and experience and it engages in broad public consultation to inform its deliberations. A report with recommendations comes at the end of a thoughtful, inclusive process, and reflects as much as possible a consensus of thinking among its diverse members, influenced by what they have heard from the public.” – Janice Harvey, Telegraph-Journal column, February 21, 2007

Response to Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses' Position Against Anti-Scab Legislation

Dear Ms. Swift,

The purpose of this response to your letter is two-fold. Firstly, to point out the importance of passing Bill C-257 - also known as anti-scab legislation. Secondly, to encourage you to stop haranguing Canada's political leaders, and intruding on matters of public business for the sake of your private interests.

There can be no doubt the CFIB, and the individuals you represent, have serious concerns regarding Anti-Scab Legislation. No doubt your interests are served when the interests of working people are squashed, and the more trouble workers have in getting fair wages and working conditions, the more easily your friends can increase their profit margins. Your desire and ability to line your pocket books is your own problem and your own business, not the concern of the body politic. Fairness and social justice is the only proper concern any government should have; therefore leave the debate to our elected representatives, such as they are.

The Middle Ground Is Not Rational When It Comes To Climate Change

By Graham H. Cox

The following is a response to an article entitled "Middle Stance Emerges in Debate Over Climate" by Andrew C. Revkin published 1 January 2007 in the New York Times. While there is nothing particularly interesting in its liberal position that always appears in the New York Times, I felt it needed special attention because it shows a clear stance that the liberals are going to take on climate change.

The article tries to suggest that there is a new position coming from the scientific community. It continues by stating that this position is the 'middle' position, presumably between those that deny that the entire science community is correct in their analysis that the earth is warming because of human behavior and those radicals that make the absurd claim that we should do something about it.

China: The Impact of Reform & Development

By Chris Walker

In 1998, the Yangtze River flooded killing more than 3000, demolishing five million homes and inundating 52 million acres of land. The economic losses have been estimated to be greater than $20 billion. There are two reasons for this catastrophe. The first and most obvious – two decades of unconstrained logging combined with destruction of wetlands. Without the basic ecological infrastructure required to manage the annual hydrological cycle, three thousand lives and more than $20 billion was lost overnight. The other reason, elusive in contemporary economic and political discourse, is the awareness of ecological systems as organs within a composite biosphere - a biosphere that possesses both the potential to preserve and expand wealth, as well as the capacity to annihilate it in seconds. Not only is this rather self evident truth marginalized generally, within China, total disregard for such considerations had been institutionalized as we will discover in the final pages of this essay.

Dr. Ed Doherty gives tough medicine to N.B. working poor, pretends it's candy.

By Dana R. Brown

The news article appearing in last Saturday’s Daily Gleaner issue, 2 December 2006, entitled “Minimum wage to reach $7.25 next year” left me angry but not surprised. This article reported that Post- Secondary Education, Training and Labour Minister, Ed Doherty, announced a minimum wage increase to $7.00 per hour on 1 January 2007, and another increase on 1 July 2007, to $7.25 per hour. Ed Doherty stated that “it will make a huge difference in the lives of the many people living on minimum wage” and that this will provide as an “opportunity” to improve living standards. The Liberal party of New Brunswick is apparently very excited by these changes as it is part of their plan to make N. B. “self sufficient” by 2025. Doherty also stated that businesses appreciate the Liberal government taking recommendations from the Minimum Wage board, rather than making a “political decision”.

Labour Le Travail: A Significant Collection in Canada's Working Class History

By Dana R. Brown

Labour / Le Travail is a bilingual and biannual journal covering a broad range of approaches to studying the working class in Canada. Based out of Newfoundland's Memorial University, L / LT has received international acclaim as a pioneer in Canadian working class history. This journal was born out of the political and socially tumultuous years of the '60s and '70s. Labour / Le Travail emerges from the New Left movement, and it might, as Verity Burgmann alludes, be a product of increased access by working class youth to universities across the country during the ‘50s and '60s.[1] The journal received its intellectual inspiration by a circle of historians inside the Communist Party of Great Britain, such as Eric Hobsbawn and E. P. Thompson.[2]

Rally for Choice Speech: Fredericton Sexual Assault Crisis Center

By the Fredericton Sexual Assault Crisis Centre

NB: Speech delivered by Krystal Payne, August 2006, at a Pro Choice demonstration in Fredericton, NB. The demonstration was planned and organized by the Access to Options Committee of the Fredericton Social Network.

Thanks for the kind words of introduction. I wish I could say I am happy to be here as a representative of the Fredericton Sexual Assault Crisis Center, but I am not. I am disappointed that we all need to be here. I am disappointed that we need to have a rally to point out that women’s constitutional rights are being ignored by the people that we have elected to represent us. I am heartsick that we need to have a rally to remind our Minister of Health that Regulation 84-20 Schedule 2 (a.1) of the New Brunswick Medical Services Payment Act Violates all five principles of the Canada Health Act: